Apple Inc. (AAPL) — Investment Tree v1
Stage 7 final essay. Bilingual companion: tree_v1_zh.md. Date: 2026-05-04 · Anchor price: ~$280 · Market cap: ~$4.2T · Forward P/E: 31.6× · Dividend yield: ~0.55% Archetype: Platform-services-transition-from-hardware-incumbent — closest analog Microsoft 2013-2018 (Office + Windows incumbent + emerging Azure platform)
SOURCE QUALITY: Mixed Tier A (10-K + Q2 FY2026 8-K + 20-yr ROIC track from filings) anchoring forward-looking Tier B/C. AAPL is the most-covered stock in the world; primary-source data is exceptionally clean. Tier C areas: forward-looking scenarios, Apple One subscriber counts (not separately disclosed), Ternus transition timing.
I. One-sentence verdict
Apple's ~31.6× forward P/E is a structural blending artifact — simultaneously too high for Products (37% margin hardware OEM) and too low for Services ($109B at 73.9% margin growing 13.5% YoY) — and as Services gross profit crosses Products gross profit in FY2027-2028, the correct sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) frame forces an analytical reclassification that is modestly favorable on a 3-5 year horizon with a near-term binary at WWDC 2026 (June 8, 35 days from anchor) that determines whether the $30-40/share orphan premium inflates or deflates; suitable as a 2-4% pre-WWDC starter, scaling to 4-6% post-confirmation, but NOT a high-conviction concentrated bet given the Services-vs-hardware reclassification is gradual and the WWDC binary is real.
II. Company snapshot
Apple Inc. is the world's largest technology company by market capitalization (~$4.2T), reporting two segments: Products (~$307B FY2025 revenue at ~37.2% gross margin) — iPhone, Mac, iPad, Wearables — and Services (~$109B FY2025 revenue at 73.9% gross margin) — App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Care, advertising, Google default-search arrangement (~$18-20B/yr). The company sells to ~2.5B active devices globally with 1B+ paying subscriptions. FY2025 net income ~$98B; FY2025 share repurchases ~$95B; ROIC ~55% structurally 4-6× WACC for 10+ years.
The Q1+Q2 FY2026 prints (Oct 2025-Mar 2026) showed iPhone +22-23% YoY across two consecutive quarters — a supercycle driven by iPhone 17 launch and the AI-eligibility upgrade window for the ~600M iPhone 12-14 cohort that cannot run Apple Intelligence. Q2 FY2026 blended gross margin reached 49.3% (highest in years), driven by Services mix-shift not hardware margin improvement.
III. The five facts that drive everything
- Services revenue $109B FY2025 (+13.5% YoY) crossed the $100B threshold for the first time. 5-year CAGR ~15.5%. ✅A
- Services gross margin 73.9% vs Products 37.2% — Services GP/revenue is ~2× Products. ✅A
- Q2 FY2026 blended gross margin 49.3% — driven by Services mix-shift, not hardware margin improvement. The structural reclassification is already showing up in margin geometry. ✅A
- iPhone supercycle Q1+Q2 FY2026 confirmed at +22-23% YoY across two consecutive quarters; AI-eligibility upgrade window thesis data-supported. ✅A
- Sell-side coverage (77 active analysts) applies a single forward P/E to blended Apple earnings; no major published SOTP model separating Services from Products exists as of May 2026. ⚠️C — the framing is collectively assumed, not actively defended.
IV. The H-0 thesis
H-0 (one sentence): Apple's current ~31.6× forward P/E is a structural blending artifact — simultaneously too high for Products (37% margin hardware OEM) and too low for Services (74% margin SaaS-equivalent) — and as Services gross profit crosses Products gross profit (~FY2027-2028), the correct SOTP frame forces analytical reclassification that is modestly favorable to holders but with a near-term binary at WWDC 2026.
Mispricing taxonomy: Structural blindness × Category (per mispricing.md). Sell-side modeling infrastructure lacks an explicit SOTP column for Apple. Apple itself discloses only Products vs Services blended gross margin (not EBIT by segment), making the structural separation invisible in standard templates. This is a coordination failure in analytical infrastructure, not individual analyst error.
Secondary mechanism: Cognitive bias × Lifecycle. The market's 15-year anchoring on "Apple = iPhone company" prevents lifecycle-stage upgrade from late-cycle hardware incumbent to early-cycle platform company — analogous to Microsoft 2013-2015 where Office+Windows+Azure took 5+ years for full reclassification.
5 falsification conditions (Bull-thesis-breakers):
- FF1 Services GM <70% for 2 consecutive quarters → re-rates SaaS-quality assumption
- FF2 Services revenue growth <8% YoY for 4 consecutive quarters → Services becomes hardware-tied annuity
- FF3 iPhone revenue declines for 3 consecutive quarters (not seasonal) → iOS retention assumption broken
- FF4 Major sell-side house publishes SOTP model with target <$280 → analytical disproof
- FF5 WWDC 2026 Siri 2.0 delayed third time AND DOJ default-search remedy severe → orphan premium evaporates
V. Tree — five branches
H-0: AAPL 31.6x forward P/E is a structural blending artifact;
SOTP reclassification is modestly favorable on 3-5 yr; WWDC 2026 binary
│
├── L1A — Services moat durability ⚠️A partial (bundle vs regulation)
│ ├── 1.1 Services growth >=10% sustained ✅A strongly supported
│ ├── 1.2 Services gross margin >=73% sustained ✅A strongly supported
│ ├── 1.3 App Store regulatory compression <5pp ⚠️B partial bound
│ └── 1.4 Apple One bundle compounds at +15% YoY ⚠️C partial (Tier C)
│
├── L1B — iPhone-as-distribution-channel ✅A supported
│ ├── 1.1 iPhone supercycle Q1+Q2 FY2026 confirmed ✅A strongly supported
│ ├── 1.2 AI-eligibility upgrade tailwind 5-yr ✅B partially-strongly supported
│ └── 1.3 China iPhone share stabilizes FY2026 H2 ⚠️B partial (in progress)
│
├── L1C — Apple Intelligence platform bet ⚠️C BINARY at WWDC 2026
│ ├── 1.1 Siri 2.0 ships at WWDC 2026 with agentic AI ⊗ NOT TESTABLE in advance
│ ├── 1.2 Privacy-first on-device AI durably differentiates ⚠️C partial (perception-dep)
│ └── 1.3 AI drives iPhone supercycle independent of features ⚠️C partial (causation TBD)
│
├── L1D — Capital allocation quality ✅A STRONGLY SUPPORTED
│ ├── 1.1 ROIC >40% sustained FY2026-2027 ✅A strongly supported
│ ├── 1.2 Buyback discipline ~$90B/yr continues ✅A strongly supported
│ └── 1.3 Capital return doesn't crowd out reinvest ✅B strongly supported (with AI capex watch)
│
└── L1E — Leadership transition risk ⚠️C neutral (Ternus direction TBD)
├── 1.1 Ternus transition timing announced by FY2026 Q4 ⚠️C partial (Tier C)
└── 1.2 Ternus continues Cook's strategic doctrine ⚠️C partial (continuity hypothesis)
Total: 7 ✅ / 7 ⚠️ / 0 ✗ / 1 ⊗ across 15 leaves
H-0 verdict: PARTIALLY SUPPORTED, ~65% confidence
VI. Key findings
Finding 1 — Services flywheel is data-confirmed at the structural-quality threshold
Q2 FY2026 Services revenue $31.0B (all-time quarterly high); gross margin 73.9% sustained across FY2024+FY2025. 5-year CAGR ~15.5%. Apple One bundle attach rate compounding offsets EU DMA + DOJ App Store regulatory compression on net. The bundle-vs-regulation race is the key 18-month sensitivity. Apple One subscriber count is not separately disclosed (Tier C), which is the single largest "show me" gap for the Services thesis.
Finding 2 — iPhone supercycle is real but binary on Apple Intelligence delivery
Q1+Q2 FY2026 iPhone +22-23% YoY across two consecutive quarters confirms supercycle. The causation question: is this driven by AI-eligibility upgrade (iPhone 12-14 owners → 17 to access Apple Intelligence) or by replacement-cycle alignment (the iPhone 12-14 cohort hitting their 3.5-year typical replacement window)? Both explanations are plausible. WWDC 2026 (June 8) is the binary — if Siri 2.0 ships with functional agentic AI, the AI-eligibility hypothesis confirms and iPhone 18 (September 2026) sustains the cycle. If Siri 2.0 delays for the third time, the supercycle may revert to standard pattern.
Finding 3 — SOTP fair-value math holds at $273-320 per share
Per peers.md SOTP analysis: Services at 30-35× EV/GP gives $2.4-2.8T equity value; Products at 15-18× EBIT-equivalent gives $1.7-2.0T equity value. Combined SOTP $4.1-4.8T = $273-320/share on 15B shares. The current $280 price is at the conservative end of SOTP fair value. The orphan premium ($30-40/share) is the implicit Apple Intelligence platform option — un-priced under conservative SOTP and partially priced under optimistic SOTP. WWDC 2026 confirmation moves the multiple toward the optimistic anchor.
Finding 4 — Capital allocation is best-in-class for 10+ years
ROIC ~55% with WACC ~9% = 6× margin. Cumulative buybacks ~$700B+ since 2012. Share count reduced from 6.6B (post-split equivalent ~26.4B) to current ~15B. The buyback is dollar-cost-averaged + accretive to per-share metrics. No fatal flag fires on Q3 (capital allocation) or balance sheet — Apple is the rare "ROIC >> WACC sustained for a decade" example, and the buyback execution has been disciplined in pace and timing.
Finding 5 — The reinvestment-runway question is open
Productive opportunities are estimated at $20-40B/yr (Apple Silicon, AI infrastructure, Services expansion, international). FCF is $110B/yr. The $70-90B gap is returned via buyback. AI capex is the binary — if Apple needs to ramp to $25-30B/yr to compete on Apple Intelligence capability, the buyback shrinks but ROIC compresses 5-10pp. If Apple's discipline at current capex is correct, the runway argument supports continued capital return. Q3 FY2026 capex commentary will reveal direction.
VII. Three valuation scenarios
(See scenarios.md for full analytical breakdown.)
| Scenario | Probability | 12-mo target | Δ from $280 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — WWDC 2026 Siri 2.0 + SOTP reclassification begins | 30% | $320-360 | +14% to +29% |
| Base — gradual reclassification + bundle resilience | 45% | $260-300 | -7% to +7% |
| Bear — Siri 2.0 delayed + DOJ + China | 25% | $220-250 | -21% to -11% |
Probability-weighted 12-month expected return: +1% to +5%. Asymmetry 1.0–1.4:1 favorable, conditional on WWDC 2026 outcome. Mature-compounder profile produces narrow distribution rather than wide.
VIII. Triggers and red flags
(Full detail in triggers_redflags.md.)
Triggers (Bull-case fires):
- T1 (35d): WWDC 2026 — Siri 2.0 + Apple Intelligence platform delivery
- T2 (12wk post-WWDC): First major sell-side SOTP model published
- T3 (October 2026): Services GP run-rate ≥85% of Products GP
- T4 (FY2026 H2): Apple One subscriber count disclosure ≥150M
- T5 (Q1 FY2027): iPhone 18 launch + AI-supercycle confirmation
- T6 (12-18 mo): DOJ Google search remedy upholds default arrangement
Red flags (Bear-case fires):
- RF1 (35d): WWDC 2026 — Siri 2.0 delayed for 3rd time
- RF2 (12-24 mo): DOJ default-search remedy severe (-$10-15B Services-equivalent annuity)
- RF3 (4Q): Services growth <8% YoY sustained → FF2 fires
- RF4 (2Q): Services GM <70% sustained → FF1 fires
- RF5 (3Q): iPhone revenue declines YoY in 3 consecutive quarters → FF3 fires
- RF6: China revenue stuck below $60B for FY2026
IX. Long-term holdability verdict
Per durability_test.md: aggregate score 19/25 (Medium-High durability). 0 fatal flags fired. ROIC ~55% structurally 4-6× WACC for 10+ years. Best-in-class capital allocation. Multi-decade business-model persistence (iPhone + Services empire).
Position-sizing recommendation
- Pre-WWDC 2026 starter: 2-3% portfolio position. Reviewer-anchored conservative; supports the structural SOTP thesis without committing on the binary.
- Post-WWDC 2026 confirmation (T1 fires): Scale to 4-6% over 90 days. Full conviction position.
- Post-WWDC 2026 disappointment (RF1 fires): Trim to 1-2% or skip. Re-evaluate post-iPhone 18 (September 2026).
For owner specifically (45% AI/semi exposure pre-AAPL):
- Existing AAPL position would be Apple-Silicon-and-Services exposure — partially correlated with AI/semi sleeve (NVDA/TSM/AMD), but with Services as a meaningful diversifier.
- A 3-5% AAPL position adds ~$3,300-5,500 to a $110K portfolio. Combined with current AI/semi $49.1K, total tech-factor exposure becomes 47-50% — within the K.3.4 correlated-exposure tolerance band but at the upper edge.
- Hard cap 6% ($6,600) absent WWDC confirmation. Hard cap 8% ($8,800) post-WWDC + first sell-side SOTP. Owner's stated portfolio framework supports the 3% starter.
Concentration-risk note (per K.3.4)
AAPL adds Apple Silicon (TSMC fab capacity) factor + iOS ecosystem factor. Partial overlap with NVDA (different AI compute layer); partial overlap with TSM (shared fab dependency). Owning NVDA + TSM + AAPL + AJNMY + GOOGL together creates AI-capex factor concentration that requires explicit acknowledgment: combined sleeve at $51-58K = 46-53% of $110K portfolio.
XII. Investment Scorecard (per MANUAL_en.md Part K.6 + K.10)
Pre-purchase 15-question checklist (long-term hold)
| # | Question | AAPL Answer | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What does the company actually do? | World's largest tech company; two segments: Products (~$307B / 74% rev / 37% GM) and Services (~$109B / 26% rev / 74% GM); 2.5B active devices, 1B+ paying subs. | ✅A |
| 2 | Why is the stock interesting now? | Q1+Q2 FY2026 iPhone supercycle confirmed (+22-23% YoY); blended GM hit 49.3%; SOTP reclassification thesis active. WWDC 2026 (35d) is the binary. | ✅B |
| 3 | Bull case (specific mechanisms)? | (a) WWDC 2026 Siri 2.0 ships with agentic AI → orphan premium expands; (b) Sell-side SOTP model published → multiple expands to 35-38× forward P/E; (c) iPhone 18 supercycle continues; (d) Services GP > Products GP crossover by FY2027. Bull target $320-360. | ✅C |
| 4 | Bear case (steelmanned)? | (a) Siri 2.0 delays 3rd time at WWDC 2026; (b) DOJ default-search remedy severe (-$10-15B annuity); (c) China iPhone share stuck below 60B; (d) EU DMA + Korea + Japan App Store cumulative >5pp Services revenue compression; (e) Multiple compresses to historical 25× P/E on regulatory-compressed EPS. Bear target $220-250. | ⚠️C |
| 5 | Valuation? | Forward P/E 31.6× (high end of Big Tech); EV/GP ~22× blended; SOTP fair value $273-320; orphan premium ~$30-40/share = AI platform option. Sits at conservative end of SOTP fair value. | ⚠️A |
| 6 | Revenue growing? | YES. FY2025 $416B (+5%); Q2 FY2026 +5% YoY blended; Services +13.5% YoY; iPhone +22-23% Q1+Q2. | ✅A |
| 7 | Profits growing? | YES. FY2025 net income ~$98B; Q2 FY2026 blended GM 49.3% (highest in years). | ✅A |
| 8 | Free cash flow positive and growing? | YES. ~$110B/yr FCF. ~3% capex/revenue. Capital-light vs hyperscaler peers ($60-90B capex). | ✅A |
| 9 | Too much debt? | NO. Net cash positive (~$30B+ before $90B annual return); AAA-equivalent credit. | ✅A |
| 10 | Strongest competitors? | Big Tech: MSFT (Cloud + Office), GOOGL (Search + Android), META (ads + AI), AMZN (commerce + AWS). Hardware: Samsung Electronics, Google Pixel. AI-native: OpenAI, Anthropic. | ⚠️B |
| 11 | What would make me sell? | Any 2 of: RF3 (Services growth <8% sustained), RF4 (Services GM <70% sustained), RF1 (Siri 2.0 delayed 3rd time at WWDC 2026). Single-event auto-protect on FF1+FF2 combined. | ✅B |
| 12 | What would prove the thesis wrong? | FF1-FF5 in h0_thesis.md. Most critical: FF4 (sell-side SOTP model published with target <$280) AND FF5 (WWDC + DOJ + China combined). | ✅C |
| 13 | Will this business model still matter in 2036? | YES — durability Q1 = 5/5 ✅. iPhone + Services empire structurally durable; 2.5B installed base; 1B+ paying subs; iOS ecosystem lock-in is the strongest in consumer tech. | ✅C |
| 14 | Is the moat widening or eroding? Mechanism? | MIXED. Apple Silicon WIDENING; Services bundle WIDENING; App Store ERODING (regulatory); iOS ecosystem HOLDING. Net widening with App Store as the eroder. Mechanism: bundle attach > take-rate compression. | ⚠️B |
| 15 | ROIC > WACC over 10 years? | YES, EXCEPTIONALLY. ROIC ~55% current; 10-yr range 22-58%; WACC ~9%. Structurally 4-6× WACC for 10+ years. Best-in-class for any large-cap. | ✅A |
Verdict tally (derived from narrative answers; M1 evidence-tier suffixes per K.3.6): 11 ✅ · 4 ⚠️ · 0 ✗ — Q1✅A, Q2✅B, Q3✅C, Q4⚠️C, Q5⚠️A (31.6× premium), Q6✅A, Q7✅A, Q8✅A, Q9✅A, Q10⚠️B (multi-front Big Tech competition), Q11✅B, Q12✅C, Q13✅C, Q14⚠️B (App Store erosion), Q15✅A.
K.3.5 Weighted-score derivation
Applying the 4-tier weighting from MANUAL §K.3.5 (verdict values: ✅ = 1.0, ⚠️ = 0.5, ✗ = 0.0):
| Tier | Weight | Rows (verdict) | Verdict-value sum | Weighted contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical (5x) | Q1✅A (does business), Q9✅A (debt — net cash AAA), Q14⚠️B (moat MIXED — Services widening, App Store eroding) | (1.0+1.0+0.5) = 2.5 | 12.5 | |
| Load-bearing (3x) | Q4⚠️C, Q5⚠️A, Q11✅B, Q12✅C | (0.5+0.5+1.0+1.0) = 3.0 | 9.0 | |
| Important (2x) | Q3✅C, Q6✅A, Q7✅A, Q15✅A | (1.0×4) = 4.0 | 8.0 | |
| Confirming (1x) | Q2✅B, Q8✅A, Q10⚠️B, Q13✅C | (1.0+1.0+0.5+1.0) = 3.5 | 3.5 | |
| TOTAL | 33.0 / 39 = 85% |
85% = high-conviction buy signal per K.3.5 interpretation (≥85% band, edge). The two ⚠️s on Critical+Confirming axis (Q14 net-widening-with-App-Store-erosion, Q10 multi-front Big Tech competition) name the regulatory + competitive monitoring conditions. The single Load-bearing ⚠️ on Q5 (31.6× premium) is the entry-timing tightening factor — cards as "high-conviction by structure but pre-event sizing discipline" rather than "high-conviction concentrated bet."
Score interpretation: AAPL sits in the same band as F (86%) and NVDA (86%), one band below AJNMY (91%) and COST (91%). The score reflects exceptional structural quality (ROIC, balance sheet, ecosystem lock-in) tempered by entry-timing premium (31.6× forward) and binary execution risk (WWDC 2026 Siri 2.0).
Scorecard summary
| Dimension | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Company quality | Exceptional — best-in-class consumer-tech franchise |
| Valuation | Demanding (31.6× P/E at high end of Big Tech); SOTP supports current price at conservative end |
| Growth | Strong (Services +13.5%; iPhone supercycle confirmed) |
| Profitability trajectory | Improving (blended GM 49.3% Q2 FY2026 — highest in years) |
| Cash flow | Exceptional ($110B/yr FCF; ~3% capex/revenue) |
| Balance sheet | Pristine (net cash + AAA credit) |
| Competitive position | Dominant in consumer ecosystem; Apple Silicon vertical-integration moat widening; App Store regulatory compression eroding |
| Long-term durability | 19/25 = Medium-High (edge of High band) |
| Risk profile | EU DMA + DOJ + Korea/Japan App Store regulation + DOJ Google search + WWDC 2026 binary + Ternus transition |
| Income generation | Modest dividend (~0.55%); buyback-heavy ($95B/yr) |
| Recommended stock type | Pre-inflection / optionality (per K.10 archetype guide) — catalyst-driven SOTP reclassification with WWDC 2026 binary + Microsoft 2013-2018 analog |
Final verdict: HOLD with active position management — 2-4% pre-WWDC, scale on confirmation
For Ming specifically:
- ✅ Pre-WWDC 2026 (Jun 8): 2-3% starter position appropriate; structural SOTP thesis supports the entry but binary timing argues against full conviction
- ⚠️ Post-WWDC 2026 confirmation: scale to 4-6% if T1 fires + first sell-side SOTP appears
- 🔻 Auto-trim if RF1 fires (Siri 2.0 delayed 3rd time) — reduce to 1-2% within 30 days
- 📅 Re-test on WWDC 2026 + Q3 FY2026 earnings (~late June 2026)
- 🎯 Hard cap 6% pre-WWDC; 8% post-confirmation absent override-rationale-required journal entry
The 2-minute pitch:
"Apple trades at 31.6× forward P/E — high end of Big Tech. The structural argument is that this is a blending artifact: the Services business at $109B / 73.9% GM / +13.5% YoY is a SaaS-equivalent platform that peers (Visa, Mastercard, Microsoft segment proxies) trade at 35-40× EV/GP for; the Products business at $307B / 37.2% GM / 3-5% growth is a hardware OEM that peers trade at 15-18× P/E for. Blended 31.6× is neither. As Services GP crosses Products GP in FY2027-2028, the SOTP frame forces analytical reclassification — modestly favorable to holders. Near-term binary at WWDC 2026 (June 8) on Siri 2.0 delivery determines whether the orphan premium ($30-40/share) inflates or deflates. Buy 2-3% pre-WWDC; scale to 4-6% if Siri 2.0 ships with agentic AI; trim to 1-2% if delayed 3rd time. Sell if Services GM <70% × 2 quarters AND Services growth <8% × 4 quarters."
Risk types most relevant (per MANUAL_en.md Part K.4):
- Regulatory risk (EU DMA + DOJ App Store + DOJ Google search remedies + Korea/Japan parallel rulings)
- Execution risk (WWDC 2026 Siri 2.0 binary; Apple Intelligence platform credibility)
- Competition risk (Android AI catching up; OpenAI + Anthropic + Google AI capability gap)
- Valuation risk (31.6× forward P/E at high end of Big Tech without clean SOTP support)
- Cyclical risk (iPhone cycle macro-sensitivity; consumer-discretionary in downturn)
"When NOT to buy" anti-pattern check (per MANUAL_en.md Part K.5):
- ✅ NOT buying because of single news headline
- ✅ NOT buying based on momentum (price has been ~$220-310 range for 18 months; current $280 is mid-range)
- ⚠️ Aware of WWDC 2026 binary structure — willing to wait or pre-position with restraint
- ❌ Online hype: institutional-driven, not retail-meme
- ❌ Has "AI" attached: substantive AI exposure (Apple Silicon + on-device + Private Cloud Compute) not narrative
- ❌ Brand familiarity bias: structural analysis grounded in 10-K + Q2 FY2026 8-K
Net: 1 anti-pattern flag (WWDC binary structure) — pre-position with restraint OR wait for confirmation.
XIII. What's NOT in this tree (deferred / documented but not built)
- Stage 2 supplementary: historical-analogue.md (Microsoft 2013-2018 analog implicit in
frameworks.md) - Stage 4 supplementary: premortem-steelman.md (covered partially in scenarios.md Bear case)
- Sources catalog:
sources.md— full bibliography of Tier A 10-K + 8-K + DOJ trial transcripts + Apple investor day commentary; deferred to next refresh - Stage 6 living:
update_{YYYY-MM-DD}.mdfiles — first scheduled post-WWDC 2026 (~June 9-10, 2026) - External research packets: ChatGPT review packet + Codex review packet — built post-WWDC if owner wants pre-trim/scale calibration
Last updated 2026-05-04 (Phase 2C corpus pattern). Source quality: Tier A primary anchors + Tier B/C forward-looking. K.3.6 evidence-strength suffix convention applied to all leaf verdicts. Next refresh: post-WWDC 2026 (June 8) + Q3 FY2026 earnings (~late June 2026).
Pre-purchase decision artifact: see pre_purchase_decision.md (deferred — pattern from reports/AJNMY/pre_purchase_decision.md if owner wants pre-WWDC consolidator).
"Don't read news; update your tree." — 90s.PM.Investing